||Walgreens Boots Alliance
||Sustainability Executive Compensation
||Clean Yield Asset Management, Singing Field Foundation
||less than 1% (presented as AGM floor resolution)
RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board Compensation Committee prepare a report assessing the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into the performance measures of senior executives under the Company's compensation incentive plans. Sustainability is defined as how environmental and social considerations, and related financial impacts, are integrated into corporate strategy over the long term.
Effectively managing for sustainability offers positive opportunities for companies and should be a key metric by which executives are judged.
Linking sustainability metrics to executive compensation could reduce risks related to sustainability underperformance, incent employees to meet sustainability goals and achieve resultant benefits, and increase accountability. Examples relevant to our company could include: corporate-wide energy efficiency targets, the amount of toxic materials contained in products sold, and water consumption per retail outlet.
Numerous studies suggest companies that integrate environmental, social and governance factors into their business strategy reduce reputational, legal and regulatory risks and improve long-term performance.
According to the largest study of CEOs on sustainability to date (CEO Study on Sustainability 2013, UN Global Compact and Accenture):
o 76 percent believe embedding sustainability into core business will drive revenue growth and new opportunities.
o 93 percent regard sustainability as key to success.
o 86 percent believe sustainability should be integrated into compensation discussions, and 67 percent report they already do.
A 2012 Harvard Business School study concluded that firms that adopted social and environmental policies significantly outperformed counterparts over the long-term, in terms of stock market and accounting performance.
In 2013, the Carbon Disclosure Project and Sustainable Insight Capital Management found companies with industry leading climate change positions exhibited better performance than peers, measured by return on equity, cash flow stability and dividend growth.
A 2010 study found analysts are more likely to recommend a stock "buy" for companies that have strong corporate responsibility strategies. Linking specific sustainability metrics to executive compensation reduces risks associated with CEO pay while also incenting employees to meet sustainability goals and achieve resultant benefits.
The Glass Lewis report Greening the Green 2014: Linking Executive Pay to Sustainability, finds a "mounting
body of research showing that firms that operate in a more responsible manner may
perform better financially.... Moreover, these companies were also more likely to tie top executive incentives to sustainability metrics."
A 2012 report by the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment and the UN Global Compact found "the inclusion of appropriate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues within executive management goals and incentive schemes can be an important factor in the creation and protection of long-term shareholder value."
A 2011 study of 490 global companies found that including sustainability targets in remuneration packages was sufficient to encourage sustainable development.
In 2013, CH2MHill found that firms that set tangible sustainability goals are more likely to tie executive compensation to the achievement of sustainability goals.
Adopting this proposal may mitigate risks associated with unaccountable CEO and executive pay and encourage more sustainable operations. We urge all shareholders to vote in support.